(May 17, 2017) – Traditional "Large Lot Zoning" is "Greener" than "Smart Growth" within Urban Growth Boundaries . . . Copyright 2009 – 2017 . . . Tom Lane . . . Photographing California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Oregon, and Seattle, Washington.
(May 24, 2012, Tom Lane) Rio Rancho, New Mexico, “The City of Vision,” is a large suburb just northwest of Albuquerque in Sandoval County. Neither Rio Rancho nor Albuquerque have urban growth boundaries.
The City has was originally planned decades ago, with a grid pattern consisting of wide streets and half acre lots. Most of the land remains undeveloped, along with privately owned rangeland beyond the City limits within unincorporated Sandoval County.
The Rio Rancho U.S. census 2010 population is 88,000, and increased from 51,000 in 2000 – a 44% increase. I would estimate that this could easily increase to a few hundred thousand within three decades, if the private rangeland continues to develop, and is ultimately annexed to the City.
Sandoval County’s 2000 population was 89,000 in 2000, and 132,000, an increase of 46%.
History and Future of Rio Rancho
Land developer AMREP bought nearlly 100,000 acres in Rio Rancho in the 1960’s and 1970’s. According to their web site:
“Rio Rancho Estates” consists of over 91,000 contiguous acres in Sandoval County, New Mexico, near Albuquerque, of which some 73,725 acres have been platted into approximately 114,500 homesite and commercial lots and 16,450 acres are dedicated to community facilities, roads and drainage with the remainder consisting of unplatted land … Rio Rancho is the fastest growing “Metropolitan” area in the United States … The City is directly in the path of Albuquerque Metro growth … Gross receipts = 40% to 50% of the city tax revenue … Favorable regulatory, tax, and political environment … Among the lowest per capita combined tax rate in state … Excellent quality of life, including affordable housing and low crime rate; Excellent school system.”
Since AMREP has platted 114,000 homesites, and the 2010 U.S. Census measured the average home size of 2.7 individuals, this would certainly be a population of 308,000, in addition to new residents in Sandoval County. The population of Sandoval County could easily approach 500,000 within three decades.
AMREP Land for Sale can be viewed at this link, from maps and aerial photos.
Stable Home Prices for 10 Years on Trulia
Due to plenty of inexpensive privately owned rangeland with no urban growth boundaries, supply has kept up with demand for single family, detached products in Rio Rancho, and neighborhing Albuquerque. The median sales price for a home in Albuquerque (on Trulia) was $133,000 in April, 2012, compared to $100,000 in January, 2000.
The median sales price for Rio Rancho was $214,000 in April, 2012, higher than Albuquerque, perhaps since Rio Rancho’s median income is $48,000 compared to $38,000 in Albuquerque, reflecting Rio Rancho’s high tech employers, including Sprint, Intel, Hewlett Packward, and others (see below). Note that data for Rio Rancho in 2000 median home prices (on Trulia) was not available.
Land also remains inexpensive since state and federal lands do not surround most of the Albuquerque – Rio Rancho metro. This contrasts with Phoenix, Flagstaff, Las Vegas, NV, and Reno, NV, where various combinations of federal (USFS, BLM) and state lands form “artificial” urban growth boundaries, resulting in a scarcity of developable land.
Indeed, Rio Rancho’s “indefinite expansion” is similar to Salt Lake City, Utah, where privately owned land in both markets, on the suburban fringe, is sold to developers at market rates, never inflated by urban growth boundaries.
For both the greater Albuquerque and Salt Lake City markets, of course, the exceptions are nearby lands owned by the USFS, such as the Sandia and Manzano Mountains east of Albuquerque, and the Wasatch Front east of Salt Lake City. And, the Native American Pueblos block development to the north of the Albuquerque-Rio Rancho metro, and also to the distant west and south. However, none of these geographic constraints prevent significant suburban growth in other directions.
Additional information on the Albuquerque-Rio Rancho market and its amazing affordability is found at my other post: https://smartgrowthusa.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/albuquerque-santa-fe-new-mexico-impact-fees-smart-growth/
New Mexico vs. Las Vegas, NV – Why Albuquerque-Rio Rancho Has Always Been Affordable
Neither Las Vegas, NV or Albuquerque-Rio Rancho have urban growth boundaries. However, unlike central New Mexico, Las Vegas, NV has federal land — creating a scarcity of developable land on the urban fringe.
Due to this land shortage, land auctioned for over $300,000 per acre, just before the housing crash, resulting in unaffordable housing, and the bubble. See the quote from Dr. Wendell Cox below.
The same thing happened with auctioning of private land in Bend, Oregon, due to the state imposed Urban Growth Boundary. However, speculation has never been a part of land transactions in Albuquerque, and this is discussed in my post on New Mexico’s Mid Region Council of Governments.
Dr. Wendell Cox writes about the horrible Las Vegas scenario with land auction prices at $300,000 an acre, from his web site “Urban Tours by Rental Car,” and his 2006 photo essay (before the crash) entitled, “Las Vegas: Playground To the World.”
“As late as the early 2000s, Las Vegas was an affordable housing market, with median house prices approximately three times median household incomes. However, as development has continued, the supply of privately owned land on the periphery has declined. Most of the developable land was owned by the federal government, which has historically sold land to developers to accommodate Las Vegas’ growth.
However, since 2001 land sales have been limited due to environmental concerns. Recent federal auctions have obtained more than $300,000 per acre. The federal government itself has been surprised at this, having anticipated only one-eighth the sales revenues. This land scarcity premium has driven the price of housing up and Las Vegas is now among the most unaffordable housing markets in the United States.
Thus, while Las Vegas does not generally practice “smart growth” or “urban containment” per se, the effect of government policies—federal auctions and Boulder City preservation—is the same.”
Here’s a 2008 land use map and constraints to buildable land within the Albuquerque-Rio Rancho metro. CLICK to ENLARGE within your web browser.
An Afternoon Drive through Rio Rancho
All of the photos below can be seen in a four hour trip through Albuquerque and Rio Rancho. You’ll need a 4WD vehicle to travel westward beyond the Rio Rancho city limits on undeveloped dirt roads, in order to truly appreciate how much developable land exists on privately owned rangeland extending for miles. Watch out for off road vehicles.
Ultimately, I’d estimate that the entire area you’ll drive around could easily support 300,000 persons, at an average residential density of 0.75dU/acre (three quarter acre lots). There are numerous quarter acre and half acre lots for sale. Search Craigs List for amazing deals.
First, we’ll look WESTWARD towards Rio Rancho from the NE Heights in Albuquerque. Rio Rancho is on the distant plain on the other side of the Rio Grande valley. If you zoom in by clicking within your web browser, you’ll find the new Rio Rancho City Center buildings (City Hall, Hewlett Packard, Santa Ana Casino offices, UNM-West, CNM, etc.).
Journey from Rio Rancho to Rangeland of Unincorporated Sandoval County
As described above, this route going west on Southern Boulevard gives you a sense of how much developable land is available both inside, and outside of the City Limits.
Warning: Due to very soft soil conditions, you must have a 4WD to see the dirt roads. Watch out for All Terrain Vehicles who will go faster than you can drive your 4WD. DO NOT attempt this during thunderstorms and flash floods.
RR is likely to undergo significant changes in the near future if their economy does not diversify from INTEL. The competition is Singapore and China according to the General Manager of the plant there.