(May 17, 2017) – Traditional "Large Lot Zoning" is "Greener" than "Smart Growth" within Urban Growth Boundaries . . . Copyright 2009 – 2017 . . . Tom Lane . . . Photographing California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Oregon, and Seattle, Washington.
Under construction
Above: Smart Growth Townhomes under construction at Snoqualmie Ridge, within the isolated North Bend-Snoqualmie urban growth, 30 minutes east of Bellevue on I-90.
Parts 1 and 2 of my series on the Mountains to Sound Greenway along I-90 extending east of Seattle –
Part 1 – (Jan. 3, 2010) Seattle Smart Growth: Mountains to Sound Greenway (I-90) Supports Smart Growth Within Existing Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB’s) – Part 1 appears in this frame below.
Links to Parts 2 and 3 –
Elevation Profile – Mountains to Sound Greenway, from Seattle to Ellensburg (west to east along Interstate 90). From: Scan of “Greenway Adventures, produced by the Mountains to Sound Greenway brochure department: http://mtsgreenway.org/
Part 1 below –
The Mountains to Sound Greenway extends for 100 miles from downtown Seattle to the City of Thorp in eastern Washington along I-90. It’s also a national scenic byway, and is administered as a philanthropic non-profit organization who sponsors trailbuilding conservation corps and permanent open space acquisition. Thanks to the Greenway, it is now possible to bike, walk, or ride a horse all the way from Seattle to Ellensburg in eastern Washington.
Overall, there are 1.4 millions acres in the greenway, and 800,000 of this is protected; the remainder is urban areas.
The protected lands within the greenway serve as background for several congested high density, smart growth developments within urban growth boundaries, including Talus and Issaquah Highlands in Issaquah, and Snoqualmie Ridge in Snoqualmie. These places are located in the middle of nowhere, with excessive commutes to the Seattle metro, wasting foreign oil. Photos of these developments will primarily be in Part 2.
The Mountains to Sound Greenway does not advocate any design principles of “smart growth” on its PDF guide to building design: http://mtsgreenway.org/newsandpublications/brochures/buildingmtsgreenway.pdf
The Puget Sound Regional Council, and Vision 2040, who administers urban growth boundaries and smart growth, in the four county region around Seattle, chose to designated large isolated areas near Snoqualmie and North Bend as “urban growth boundary islands,” with 30 minute commutes to downtown Bellevue. This is despite closer land near Sammamish, Preston, and along the Redmond-Fall City Road (SR-202), with shorter commutes.
Does the PSRC want to make your commutes longer in this era of increasing gas prices? If so, what is their motivation, given plenty of buildable land much closer to the Seattle-Bellevue metro? Should the Washington Growth Management Act be suspended, and the Puget Sound Regional Council be dissolved, to stimulate construction of homes with yards (not smart growth) closer to Seattle?
And remember, Urban Growth Boundaries are the least efficient solution towards permanent open space preserves, as University of Washington professor Richard Morrill discusses. Since UGB’s are eventually extended, pursuant to population, housing, and business expansion, then previously preserved areas may eventually be designated for 1/10th acre lots.
In addition, land designated as large lot rural properties is not even open to the public in the first place. In fact, under the PSRC, much of the developable land shown in these photos and maps is classified as “rural,” with required large lots. How can this land, along with poorly maintained narrow backcountry roads with no shoulders and no sidewalks (i.e. SR-202, the Redmond-Fall City Road), provide safe recreational opportunities for cyclists and runners?
Of course, philanthropic organizations such as the Mountains to Sound Greenway offer trailbuilding. But the PSRC makes their job harder. If the PSRC had a master plan of residential growth on all buildable lands, in combination with generous greenbelts, trails, and bike paths in rural areas, then the County services such as sidewalks would not suddenly “terminate” every time you move outside the urban growth boundary.
Below, I have outlined the Snoqualmie and North Bend urban growth areas in pink. I have also delineated buildable lands, generally closer to the Seattle-Bellevue metro, in burgundy. However, note that this greenway map only covers a portion of King County, and that much more developable land exists in King, Pierce, Snonomish, and Kitsap Counties, the four counties controlled by the tyrannical Puget Sound Regional Council and Vision 2040. Link: http://mtsgreenway.org/newsandpublications/maps
CLICK to enlarge and then ZOOM to read text:
And, here’s the map of Vision 2040, showing the four county urban growth boundary, along with isolated areas of urban growth such as Snoqualmie-North Bend and also in many small towns along the Cascade Foothills (i.e. Enumclaw, Maple Valley, and towns in the Snoqualmie and Snohomish Valleys. Link: http://psrc.org/assets/1776/V2040poster.pdf
CLICK to enlarge and then ZOOM to read text:
Again, for unknown reasons, the PSRC is forcing long commutes, dependence on foreign oil from countries that want to blow up Israel, and more air pollution, when there is plenty of developable land much closer to Seattle, Bellevue, Everett, and Tacoma. Just like the DLCD in Oregon, this agency operates in such a way to avoid public oversight, and the result is long commutes, heavy traffic, and a diminished quality of life. Those of us with backgrounds in economic geography and landscape architecture have no opportunities to voice our concerns to the PSRC or DLCD, and they have no obligation to respond to our concerns about their performance, or in this case, lack thereof.
Here’s a map I made on a google template of developable lands along the Greenway within the vicinity of smart growth developments Talus, Issaquah Highlands, and Snoqualmie Ridge. As you can see, there are lands closer to Bellevue and Seattle besides Snoqualmie Ridge and North Bend.
Furthermore, extensive areas of developable lands in King County are north of this map, just east of Redmond along the Redmond-Fall City Road, and just southeast of this map, along May Valley Road just east of Renton, and extending further south east of Covington. All of these areas have been blocked from higher density developments by the PSRC, and remain in a rural state with large lot sizes and hobby farms. All of these lands have half the commute distance to Snoqualmie Ridge.
For location efficiency, there is no logical reason for leapfrogging past parks and open space that should remain a part of the Mountains to Sound Greenway. For national security and conservation of foreign oil, we should do everything possible to concentrate developments close to city centers. Instead of smart growth with no yards, a more intelligent approach are heavily treed half acre lots, with linear urban greenbelts with bike trails that serve as open space, instead of large parks of several hundred acres on steep terrain, that are only accessible by foreign oil (i.e. Cougar, Squak, Tiger, and other mountain parks, in the Mountains to Sound Greenway).
For example, here’s a linear greenbelt with trail in Corvallis, Oregon:
Here’s are three photos of systems of linear trails in Eugene, Oregon:
Here is my rough outline of east central King County. CLICK and then ZOOM to read annotated text:
Here is an image with a wider view than the previous map, from Bellevue to Tanner, Washington, the furthest eastward extension of the PSRC’s Urban Growth Boundary (adjacent to North Bend, in the Snoqualmie River Valley). All the photographs in this post and part two were taken wthin this sattelite view. CLICK and then ZOOM to read text:
My photos in this post present a photo essay from from Bellevue to Fall City to Snoqualmie to Sammammish, to provide an idea of the local incorporated towns, and, lands that could be developed with much shorter commutes. I like to use views from hills whenever possible to delineate large scale landscape features. Of course, there are only 100 sunny days per year in Seattle, many with heavy fog and low clouds.
First, looking northwest from Bellevue’s Hilltop Community towards downtown Seattle and Bellevue. I-90 and the Greenway both begin in Seattle, and runs east-west at the base of the hill where I’m standing. CLICK to enlarge and then ZOOM to see the two skylines on a rather smoggy January, 2011 sunset:
More Photos of Developments along the Greenway at Part 2 and 3 –
Agree with you about more people on one acre lots with wildlife and room for gardens – except – Seattle is already overpopulated you have photos of Eugene and Corvallis on there, seems that Seattle companies could have sattelite offices from these Oregon cities and maybe places like ellensburg, spokane, wenatchee, and yakima.
Do you agree with the overpopulation ideas of the smart growth folks or are you more of the Libertarian type that wants to see cities become the size of Los Angeles
Ryan,
Overpopulation is a subjective term … one person may view a City of a million as overpopulated, while another may think it’s too small, and want 5 million.
I do not agree with the anti-zoning / anti-regulation Libertarian folks who do NOT wish to curb sprwal.
Once a metro region gets to a certain size, air pollution, traffic, crime, and other issues decrease quality of life. This “size” of the metro when this “begins to take place” seems to vary by location. Clearly, both Las Vegas (at about 2 million) and Los Angeles (at 10 million), along with Seattle (3.5 million) have passed this critical threshold.
We can mitigate urban sprwal with greenbelts, parks, natural areas, bike paths, treeplanting, and other features that increase the quality of life. There are lots of volunteer organizations who help improve the quality of life (see the sidebar to this web site).
Agree with you about the sattelite offices for tellecommuting – people can leave congested Portland and Seattle to mountain towns like Cle Elum, Bend, Durango, Tahoe, etc. -Tom/webmaster